And what we've said is, is that same-sex couples are a group, a class that deserves heightened scrutiny, that the Supreme Court needs to ask the state why it's doing it. And if the state doesn't have a good reason, it should be struck down. That's the core principle as applied to this case.As Adam B wrote of the administration's brief, "there was an opportunity for boldness here, and the Obama administration did not take it." Though defending that relative procedural moderation, Obama's answer Friday emphasized that his own stance on equality would be more bold.Now, the Court may decide that if it doesn't apply in this case, it probably can't apply in any case. There's no good reason for it. If I were on the Court, that would probably be the view that I'd put forward. But I'm not a judge, I'm the President.
Friday, March 1, 2013
'If I were on the Court,' Obama would vote for marriage equality nationwide
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment