Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Conservatives given one last shot at blocking Sandy relief aid, but appear to be on the losing side

As this video of Rep. Peter King (R-NY) reminds us, Republicans have killed the legislation before,
but this time passage seems likely. David Rogers:
Republicans cleared the way for House action Tuesday on Hurricane Sandy disaster aid after the leadership stepped in to pare back scores of amendments that could have been problematic to passage.

More than 90 amendments had been filed as of Friday but just a dozen will be made in order under a resolution reported by the House Rules Committee on Monday night following nearly four hours of testimony.

Of those amendments that will be allowed to come up for a vote, only one of them would truly imperil the aid package: an amendment authored by GOP congressman Mick Mulvaney of South Carolina and supported by House conservatives.
During House debate on this additional Sandy relief money, there will be one major vote on paying for this disaster aid, as a group of GOP lawmakers will ask for an across the board budget cut of 1.63% in all discretionary accounts for defense and domestic spending (not including Medicare and Social Security).

That would offset the cost of the $17 billion aid plan; the $33 billion in aid would basically be chalked up to the budget deficit, and not paid for, which has been the standard operating procedure for years when it comes to disaster spending.

Other than Mulvaney's poison pill, no amendments change the aid package enough to make it unlikely to pass the House. And because Mulvaney's poison pill is as toxic to many Republicans as it would be to Democrats, its prospects aren't good.

Assuming Mulvaney's amendment fails, there should be enough Democratic votes for the measure to secure final passage. If and when that happens, it will be worth remembering that it will have passed despite opposition from a who's who of conservative groups, including Heritage Action, Americans for Tax Reform, and the Club for Growth'and that after the tax cliff deal, this would be the second consecutive defeat for conservatives.

No comments:

Post a Comment